Bible Master Class Series:
Lesson 3 "Writing the Bible"
{pdf=/pdf/masterclass/writingbible.pdf|100%|100%}
A redactor takes existing tradition, either oral or written and:
-
Compiles it with other material that fits
To shorten the pericope (ie story section) I have not included all the Noah story.
Noah 1 |
Noah 2 |
|
|
The analysis suggests that the redactor had at least two sources. One emphasized ritual cleanness of the animals (7 and 2) and the other survival of the animals (2).
-
Emphasises some parts, de-emphasises other parts.
Founding the Monarchy 1 |
Founding the Monarchy 2 |
|
|
The analysis suggests that the redactor had at least two sources. One was pro monarchy and the other was anti monarchy. Using a process of conflation (ie taking the sources and mixing them together) the redactor expresses the idea that monarchy may be either good or bad.
-
Re-casts stories for the current situation
-
Mt 12:1-9
The text picks up a story about David from 1Samuel (21:6) to make a point about physical needs vs righteousness.
-
Corrects misunderstanding of their audience.
-
Amos 5:25,26
In the traditions, generally the Wilderness journey is cast as a time of special devotion to God. Here Amos takes that tradition and recasts it to extend the Israelite's idolatry into the sacred Wilderness journey.
-
Explains historical oddities for their contemporaries.
-
1Sam 9:6-11
The redactor was operating in a time when the idiom of his source wasn't accessible to his audience. He adds a side note that explains the use of the term “seer”.
-
The Synoptic Problem – Sources and Redactors in Action
Examine the following passages. Decide which sections are Mark (Triple Tradition), Q and Special L or Special M.